Literaturverzeichnis

Allison, Graham T., and Philip Zelikow. 1999. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 2. ed. New York, NY: Longman.

Almond, Gabriel A., and Stephen J. Genco. 1977. “Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics.” World Politics 29 (4): 489–522. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010037.

Alvarez, R. Michael, and Simon Heuberger. 2022. “How (Not) to Reproduce: Practical Considerations to Improve Research Transparency in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 55 (1): 149–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521001062.

Anderson, Samantha F., and Scott E. Maxwell. 2017. “Addressing the "Replication Crisis": Using Original Studies to Design Replication Studies with Appropriate Statistical Power.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 52 (3): 305–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1289361.

Arendt, Hannah. 2003. Was Ist Politik? München: Piper.

Balzacq, Thierry, Peter Dombrowski, and Simon Reich. 2019. “Is Grand Strategy a Research Program? A Review Essay.” Security Studies 28 (1): 58–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2018.1508631.

Berry, David M. 2011. “The Computational Turn: Thinking about the Digital Humanities.” Culture Machine 12: 1–22.

BOAI. 2002. Budapest Open Access Initiative. Budapest: budapestopenaccessinitiative.org. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read/.

Booth, C., Wayne, G. Colomb Gregory, and Joseph M. Williams. 2008. The Craft of Research. 3. ed. Chicago, IL; London: The University of Chicago Press.

Bourne, Philip E., Jon R. Lorsch, and Eric D. Green. 2015. “Sustaining the Big-Data Ecosystem.” Nature 527: S16–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/527S16a.

Breznau, Nate, Eike Mark Rinke, Alexander Wuttke, Hung H. V. Nguyen, Muna Adem, Jule Adriaans, Amalia Alvarez-Benjumea, et al. 2022. “Observing Many Researchers Using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe of Uncertainty.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (44): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2203150119.

Bullinger, Hans-Jörg et al. 2003. Berliner Erklärung über Den Offenen Zugang Zu Wissenschaftlichem Wissen. Https://openaccess.mpg.de/68053/Berliner_Erklaerung_dt_Version_07-2006.pdf (Zugriffsdatum: 20.02.2019). Berlin: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft.

Camerer, Colin F., Anna Dreber, Eskil Forsell, Teck-Hua Ho, Jürgen Huber, Magnus Johannesson, Michael Kirchler, et al. 2016. “Evaluating Replicability of Laboratory Experiments in Economics.” Science 351 (6280): 1433–36. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0918.

Camerer, Colin F., Anna Dreber, Felix Holzmeister, Teck-Hua Ho, Jürgen Huber, Magnus Johannesson, Michael Kirchler, et al. 2018. “Evaluating the Replicability of Social Science Experiments in Nature and Science Between 2010 and 2015.” Nature Human Behaviour 2 (9): 637–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z.

cOAlitionS. 2018. Accelerating the Transition to Full and Immediate Open Access to Scientific Publications. Brussels: cOAlitionS. https://www.coalition-s.org/wp-content/uploads/PlanS_Principles_and_Implementation_310519.pdf.

Colaresi, Michael. 2016. “Preplication, Replication: A Proposal to Efficiently Upgrade Journal Replication Standards.” International Studies Perspectives 17 (4): 367–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekv016.

Crüwell, Sophia, Johnny van Doorn, Alexander Etz, Matthew C. Makel, Hannah Moshontz, Jesse C. Niebaum, Amy Orben, Sam Parsons, and Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck. 2019. “Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List.” Zeitschrift für Psychologie 227 (4): 237–48. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387.

Dafoe, Allan. 2014. “Science Deserves Better: The Imperative to Share Complete Replication Files.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (1): 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651300173X.

Eco, Umberto. 2020. Wie Man Eine Wissenschaftliche Abschlußarbeit Schreibt: Doktor-, Diplom- Und Magisterarbeit in Den Geistes- Und Sozialwissenschaften. 14th ed. Wien: facultas – utb.

Eder, Franz. 2011. “The European Union’s Counter-Terrorism Policy Towards the Maghreb: Trapped Between Democratisation, Economic Interests and the Fear of Destabilisation.” European Security 20 (3): 431–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2011.608353.

———. 2015. Der Irakkrieg 2003. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press – IUP. https://doi.org/10.15203/2936-75-2.

———. 2019. “Making Concurrence-Seeking Visible: Groupthink, Discourse Networks, and the Iraq War 2003.” Foreign Policy Analysis 15 (1, DOI 10.1093/fpa/orx009): 21–42.

———. 2023. “Discourse Network Analysis.” In Routledge Handbook of Foreign Policy Analysis Methods, edited by Patrick A. Mello and Falk Ostermann, 516–35. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003139850-39.

Eder, Franz, Chiara Libiseller, and Bernhard Schneider. 2021. “Contesting Counter-Terrorism: Discourse Networks and the Politicisation of Counter-Terrorism in Austria.” Journal of International Relations and Development 24 (1, DOI 10.1057/s41268-020-00187-8): 171–95.

Edwards, Aled. 2016. “Perspective: Science Is Still Too Closed.” Nature 533 (7602): S70–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/533S70a.

English, James F., and Ted Underwood. 2016. “Shifting Scales: Between Literature and Social Science.” Modern Language Quarterly 77 (3): 277–95. https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-3570612.

Engzell, Per, and Julia M. Rohrer. 2021. “Improving Social Science: Lessons from the Open Science Movement.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (2): 297–300. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S1049096520000967.

EOSC. 2017. EOSC Declaration. Brussels: European Open Science Cloud. https://eosc-portal.eu/sites/default/files/eosc_declaration.pdf.

Flynn, Michael E. 2014. “Military Leadership, Institutional Change, and Priorities in Military Spending.” Foreign Policy Analysis 10 (2): 103–26.

Franck, Norbert, and Joachim Stary. 2009. Die Technik Des Wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens. 15th ed. Paderborn, et al.: Schöningh – UTB.

Gaddis, John Lewis. 2018. On Grand Strategy. New York, NY: Penguiun Press.

Garner, Robert. 2009. “Introduction: The Nature of Politics and Political Analysis.” In Introduction to Politics, edited by Robert Garner, Peter Ferdinand, and Stephanie Lawson, 1–21. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gerring, John. 2012. Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Graham, Matthew H., Gregory A. Huber, Neil Malhotra, and Cecilia Hyunjung Mo. 2023. “Irrelevant Events and Voting Behavior: Replications Using Principles from Open Science.” The Journal of Politics 85 (1): 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1086/714761.

Grimmer, Justin. 2015. “We Are All Social Scientists Now: How Big Data, Machine Learning, and Causal Inference Work Together.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (1): 80–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651400178.

Gustafsson, Karl, and Linus Hagström. 2018. “What Is the Point? Teaching Graduate Students How to Construct Political Science Research Puzzles.” European Political Science 17 (4): 634–48. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0130-y.

Guzzini, Stefano. 2021. Some Basics on (Mainly Qualitative) Research Design. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4294740.

Hajer, Maarten A. 1993. “Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Britain.” In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, edited by Frank Fisher and John Forester, 43–76. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press.

Hart, Chris. 2009. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. London et al.: Sage.

Hayek, Lore. 2016. Design Politischer Parteien: Plakatwerbung in österreichischen Wahlkämpfen. Vol. 14. Studien Zur Politischen Kommunikation. Wien: LIT Verlag.

Hobbes, Thomas. 1998. Leviathan: Erster Und Zweiter Teil. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam.

Hollis, Martin, and Steven Smith. 1991. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Holmes, David. 2016. “A New Chapter in Innovation.” Nature 533: S54–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/533S54a.

Hurston, Zora Neale. 1984. Dust Tracks on a Road: An Autobiography. 2nd ed. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Ioannidis, John P. 2005. “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” PLOS Medicine 2 (8): 0696–0701. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.

Jagadish, H. V. 2015. “Big Data and Science: Myths and Reality.” Big Data Research 2 (2): 49–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2015.01.005.

James, Gareth, Daniela Witten, Trevor Hastie, and Rober Tibshirani. 2021. An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in r. New York, NY: Springer. https://hastie.su.domains/ISLR2/ISLRv2_website.pdf.

Janz, Nicole, and Jeremy Freese. 2021. “Replicate Others as You Would Like to Be Replicated Yourself.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (2): 305–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000943.

Kalina, Ondřej, Stefan Köppl, Uwe Kranenpohl, Rüdiger Lang, Jürgen Stern, and Alexander Straßner. 2009. Grundkurs Politikwissenschaft: Einführung Ins Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Kapiszewski, Diana, and Sebastian Karcher. 2021. “Transparency in Practice in Qualitative Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (2): 285–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000955.

Kellstedt, Paul M., and Guy D. Whitten. 2013. The Fundamentals of Political Science Research. Second. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Keohane, Robert O. 2009. “Political Science as a Vocation.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (2): 359–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096509090489.

King, Gary. 1995. “Replication, Replication.” PS: Political Science /& Politics 28 (3): 444–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301.

King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Quantitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Korku Avenyo, Elvis et al. 2016. “A More Developmental Approach to Science.” In UNESCO Science Report: Towards 2030, edited by Flavia Schlegel, 57–83. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific; Cultural Organization.

Kukkonen, Anna, and Tuomas Ylä-Antilla. 2020. “The Science–Policy Interface as a Discourse Network: Finland’s Climate Change Policy 2002–2015.” Politics and Governance 8 (2): 229–42. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2611.

Lakatos, Imre. 1989. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Edited by John Worrall and Gregory Currie. Philosophical Papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lake, David A. 2010/2011. “Two Cheers for Bargaining Theory: Assessing Rationalist Explanations of the Iraq War.” International Security 35 (3): 7–52.

Lasswell, Harold D. 1951 [1936]. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

Lazer, David et al. 2009. “Computational Social Science.” Science 323 (5915): 721–22. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167742.

Leifeld, Philip. 2018. “Discourse Network Analysis: Policy Debates as Dynamic Networks.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks, edited by Jenniger Nicoll Victor, Alexander H. Montgomery, and Mark Lubell, 301–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Leifeld, Philip, Johannes Gruber, and Felix Rolf Bossner. 2019. Discourse Network Analyzer Manual. https://github.com/leifeld/dna/releases/download/v2.0-beta.24/dna-manual.pdf: Github.

Leifeld, Philip, and Sebastian Haunss. 2012. “Political Discourse Networks and the Conflict over Software Patents in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (3): 382–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02003.x.

Lilienfeld, Scott O. 2017. “Psychology’s Replication Crisis and the Grant Culture: Righting the Ship.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 12 (4): 660–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616687745.

Lipson, Charles. 2005. How to Write a BA Thesis: A Practical Guide from Your First Ideas to Your Finished Paper. Chicago, IL; London: The University of Chicago Press.

Little, Andrew. 2016. “Three Templates for Introductions to Political Science Articles.” https://anthlittle.github.io/files/little_intros.pdf.

Liu, Hexuan, and Guang Guo. 2016. “Opportunities and Challenges of Big Data for the Social Sciences: The Case of Genomic Data.” Social Science Research 59: 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.04.016.

Loken, Eric, and Andrew Gelman. 2017. “Measurement Error and the Replication Crisis.” Science 355 (6325): 584–85. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal3618.

Lupia, Arthur. 2021. “Practical and Ethical Reasons for Pursuing a More Open Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (2): 301–4. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S1049096520000979.

Manutscharjan, Aschot. 1999. “Das Regierungs- Und Parteiensystem Armeniens.” In Brennpunkt südkaukasus: Aufbruch Trotz Krieg, Vertreibung Und Willkürherrschaft?, edited by Gerhard Mangott, 14:19–60. Laxenburger Internationale Studien. Wien: Braumüller.

Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. 1992 [1848]. Communist Manifesto. The World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Maxwell, Scott E., Michael Y. Lau, and George S. Howard. 2018. “Is Psychology Suffering from a Replication Crisis? What Does ’Failure to Replicate’ Really Mean?” American Psychologist 70 (6): 487–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039400.

Merton, Rober K. 1973. “The Normative Structure of Science.” In The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, edited by Norman W. Storer, 267–78. Chicago und London: The University of Chicago Press.

Michener, William K. 2015. “Ten Simple Rules for Creating a Good Data Management Plan.” PLOS Computational Biology 11 (10): e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525.

Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics.” International Organization 51 (4): 513–53.

Munafò, Marcus R., Brian A. Nosek, Dorothy V. M. Bishop, Katherine S. Button, Christopher D. Chambers, Nathalie Percie du Sert, Uri Simonsohn, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Jennifer J. Ware, and John P. A. Ioannidis. 2017. “A Manifesto for Reproducible Science.” Nature Human Behaviour 1 (1): 0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021.

Neupane, Bhanu. 2016. “A More Developmental Approach to Science.” In UNESCO Science Report: Towards 2030, edited by Flavia Schlegel, 6–8. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific; Cultural Organization.

Niedermair, Klaus. 2010. Recherchieren Und Dokumentieren: Der Richtige Umgang Mit Literatur Im Studium. Konstanz: UVK – UTB.

O’Leary, Zina. 2014. The Essential Guide to Doing Your Research Project. 2. ed. London, et al.: Sage.

Oetiker, Tobias, Hubert Partl, Irene Hyna, and Elisabeth Schlegl. 2021. The Not so Short Introduction to LaTeX2e: Or LaTeX2e in 139 Minutes. Olten: https://tobi.oetiker.ch/. https://tobi.oetiker.ch/lshort/lshort.pdf.

Oneal, John R., Bruce Russett, and Michael L. Berbaum. 2003. “Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885-1992.” International Studies Quarterly 47 (3): 371–93.

Open Science Collaboration. 2015. “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.” Science 349 (6251): 943. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.

Patzelt, Werner J. 1997. Einführung in Die Politikwissenschaft: Grundriß Des Faches Und Studiumsbegleitende Orientierung. Passau: Wissenschaftsverlag Richard Rothe.

Powner, Leanne C. 2015. Empirical Research and Writing: A Political Science Student’s Practical Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Prinz, Florian, Thomas Schlange, and Khusru Asadullah. 2011. “Believe It or Not: How Much Can We Rely on Published Data on Potential Drug Targets?” Nature Reviews 10 (712). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3439-c1.

Punch, Keith F. 2014. Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Purcell, Andrew. 2019. Big Data in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Https://sciencenode.org/feature/big-data-humanities-and-social-sciences.php (Zugriffsdatum: 20.20.2019).

Qui, Lin, Sarah Hian May Chan, and David Chan. 2018. “Big Data in Social and Psychological Science: Theoretical and Methodological Issues.” Journal of Computational Social Science 1 (1): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-017-0013-6.

Ramachandran, Rahul, Kaylin Bugbee, and Kevin Murphy. 2021. “From Open Data to Open Science.” Earth and Space Science 8 (5): e2020EA001562. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001562.

Randolph, Justus J. 2009. “A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 14 (13): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7275/b0az-8t74.

Reid, Natalie. 2010. Getting Published in International Journals: Writing Strategies for European Social Scientists. Oslo: NOVA - Norwegian Social Research.

Rinke, Eike Mark, and Alexander Wuttke. 2021. “Open Minds, Open Methods: Transparency and Inclusion in Pursuit of Better Scholarship.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (2): 281–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520001729.

Rohlfing, Ingo, Lea Königshofen, Susanne Krenzer, Jan Schwalbach, and Ayjeren Bekmuratovna R. 2021. “A Reproduction Analysis of 106 Articles Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis, 2016–2018.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (2): 292–96. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S1049096520001717.

Rowling, J. K. 2003. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. London: Bloomsbury Children’s.

Salganik, Matthew J. 2018. Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Saltzman, Ilai Z. 2012. “Soft Balancing as Foreign Policy: Assessing American Strategy Toward Japan in the Interwar Period.” Foreign Policy Analysis 8 (2): 131–50.

Sauer, Frank, and Carlos Masala, eds. 2017. Handbuch Der Internationalen Politik. 2. ed. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19918-4.

Schlichte, Klaus. 2005. Einführung in Die Arbeitstechniken Der Politikwissenschaft. 2nd ed. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Schlitz, Marc. 2018a. Science Without Publication Paywalls a Preamble to: cOAlition s for the Realisation of Full and Immediate Open Access. Brussels: cOAlitionS. https://www.coalition-s.org/wp-content/uploads/cOAlitionS_Preamble.pdf.

———. 2018b. “Science Without Publication Paywalls: cOAlition s for the Realisation of Full and Immediate Open Access.” PLOS Biology 16 (9, e3000031, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000031): 1–4.

Schooler, Jonathan W. 2014. “Metascience Could Rescue the ‘Replication Crisis’.” Nature 515 (7525): 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/515009a.

Schwartz, Martin A. 2008. “The Importance of Stupidity in Scientific Research.” Journal of Cell Science 121 (11): 1771. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.033340.

Shrout, Patrick E., and Joseph L. Rodgers. 2018. “Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis.” Annual Review of Psychology 69 (1): 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845.

Silove, Nina. 2018. “Beyond the Buzzword: The Three Meanings of "Grand Strategy".” Security Studies 27 (1): 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2017.1360073.

Slater, James. 2014. Lichtjahre. Berlin: VBT.

Stall, Shelley. 2019. “Make All Scientific Data FAIR.” Nature 570: 27–29.

Stoker, Gerry, and David Marsh. 2002. “Introduction.” In Theory and Method in Political Science, 1–16. New York, NY: Palgrave.

Stratmann, Martin. 2003. Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. Berlin: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration.

Strunk, William, Jr. 2000. The Elements of Style. Edited by E. B. White. 4th ed. New York, NY et al.: Longman.

Stykow, Petra. 2019. Politikwissenschaftlich Arbeiten. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink Verlag – utb.

Tannenwald, Nina. 1999. “The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use.” International Organization 53 (3): 433–68. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550959.

The Declaration on Research Assessment. 2012. San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. San Francisco: DORA. https://sfdora.org/read/.

Theisen, Manuel René. 2005. Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten: Technik – Methodik – Form. München: Franz Vahlen.

Turabian, Kate L. 2007. A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. 7. ed. Chicago, IL; London: The University of Chicago Press.

University of Chicago. 2017. The Chicago Manual of Style: The Essential Guide for Writers, Editors, and Publishers. 17th ed. The University of Chicago Press.

Van Atteveldt, Wouter, Scott Althaus, and Hartmut Wessler. 2021. “The Trouble with Sharing Your Privates: Pursuing Ethical Open Science and Collaborative Research Across National Jurisdictions Using Sensitive Data.” Political Communication 38 (1-2): 192–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1744780.

Van Noorden, Richard. 2013. “Open Access: The True Cost of Science Publishing.” Nature 495 (7442): 426–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/495426a.

Wagner, Caroline S., Travis A. Whetsell, and Loet Leydesdorff. 2017. “Growth of International Collaboration in Science: Revisiting Six Specialities.” Scientometrics 110 (3): 1633–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2230-9.

Waite, Maurice. 2012. Paperback Oxford English Dictionary. 7. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.

Wendt, Alexander. 2010. Social Theory of International Politics. Vol. 67. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

White, Patrick. 2009. Developing Research Questions: A Guide for Social Scientists. Houndmills, et al.: Palgrave.

Wilkinson, Mark D., Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, et al. 2016. “The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship.” Scientific Data 3 (160018): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.

Wuttke, Alexander. 2019. “Why Too Many Political Science Findings Cannot Be Trusted and What We Can Do about It: A Review of Meta-Scientific Research and a Call for Academic Reform.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 60 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-018-0131-7.

Zinnes, Dina A. 1980. “Three Puzzles in Search of a Researcher: Presidential Address.” International Studies Quarterly 24 (3): 315–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600250.